Native? Indian? Indigenous?

By Natasha Kaye Johnson

VERMILLION, S.D. — Not everyone has a strong opinion, but for consistency, newspapers must decide how to refer to America’s first residents.

The Associated Press uses the term American Indians, and the online publication reznetnews.org uses Native Americans. Several years ago, students at the American Indian Journalism Institute voted in favor of using Native American.

Reznetnews.org project director Dennis McAuliffe posed the question to students at AIJI.  Of 20 students, 12 liked the term Native Americans.  One student liked American Indians better; another preferred indigenous.
Students did not debate or discuss which term is most preferred, and it was decided reznetnews would continue using ‘Native American.’

The topic remains a point of discussion among scholars.

“It does matter,” said Patrice Kunesh, associate professor of law at the University of South Dakota and director of the Institute of American Indian Studies program.

Kunesh said the most acceptable reference is American Indians, because the term includes Alaska Natives and Native Hawaiians.  The term Native Americans, when dissected by the law and history, does not.

“There was a great debate over 20 years ago about whether Native American included Alaska Natives and Native Hawaiians,” said Kunesh, a member of the Standing Rock Sioux tribe.
Kunesh said it is most important to ask how the person would like to be referred to and even more so, refer specifically to the tribe.

When dealing with law and politics, the terms can become tricky.  Kunesh said she expects the debate to continue.

“It’s a struggle for everyone it seems,” she said.

Jeff Harjo, executive director for the Native American Journalists Association, said the topic resurfaced recently.

Harjo prefers the term American Indians, but was not partial to it for any particular reason.  He said there has not been discussion about changing the organization’s name, and he often sees the terms used interchangeable.

“I’ve seen both (used),” said Harjo, a member of the Seminole tribe from Oklahoma.
While reznetnews will continue to use “ Native Americans,” McAuliffe said it wasn’t a major controversy.
“It’s something we all don’t agree on,” McAuliffe said, “but it’s not a big deal.”

Share

3 Comments

  1. The whole process of groupings- being in them or out of them and the process of self-definition, and the effects of external definition to identity - is time spent talking that could have been spent working..

    One of the purposes of naming people is surely to include or exclude others from the group- humanities greatest fears include… rejection, isolation, and marginalisation.

    Ahahaha- and then there is the group marked ‘other.’ From the ‘part’-Indigenous perspective it gets real complex. You can get black people who are white and white people who are black, and then you can just get over the naming that takes the soul from the individual and get down to sortin’ matters out…

    One Love Maiia

  2. In the word of comedian groucho Marx - “I wouldn’t want to be a member of any club that would have me”

  3. Personally, I use and prefer American Indian.

Leave a comment